Support Team Notice – We will have limited phone support from 27 Mar – 31 Mar. Please email all enquiries to info@safetyculture.com.au

Queensland aquatic centre fined $85,000 over electric shock incident

Jan 25th 2024 |

Queensland aquatic centre fined $85,000 over electric shock incident

```html

Queensland Aquatic Centre Fined $85,000 Over Electric Shock Incident

A fine of $85,000 has been imposed on a Queensland aquatic centre after an employee suffered an electric shock in a workplace incident in February 2022. The penalty highlights how critical electrical safety remains for facilities operating equipment near powerlines.

What Happened at the Aquatic Centre

The worker was using a pool-cleaning tool at the aquatic centre when equipment touched nearby powerlines. This contact triggered one of several electric shocks reported across Queensland workplaces in recent years.

The centre admitted it failed to provide a safe work environment, thus exposing staff to risk of serious injury or death. Such admissions underscore why robust incident management practices matter for organisations handling pool-cleaning tasks near electrical infrastructure.

Regulator's Response on Electrical Safety

Head of Queensland's Electrical Safety Office, Donna Heelan, stressed the importance of adhering to regulations designed to prevent such incidents.

"Working near powerlines can be fatal. Touching them or straying into the exclusion zone around them can result in serious electric shock or electrocution," Ms Heelan said.

Why Electrical Safety Matters in Aquatic Work Environments

Pool-cleaning operations often require workers to manoeuvre long-handled tools near overhead lines, raising exclusion zone risks that many facilities underestimate. Employers must ensure cleaning equipment and work practices keep employees clear of energised infrastructure at all times.

Health and safety obligations extend beyond simple compliance checklists. Facilities managing pools, cleaning schedules, and maintenance work should regularly review electrical hazards as part of broader health assessments, since overlooking this responsibility can lead to devastating consequences for workers and employers alike.

  • Maintain safe distances between cleaning tools and powerlines during pool work
  • Train staff on exclusion zone boundaries before cleaning tasks begin
  • Review electrical safety procedures regularly, especially after equipment changes
  • Document all near-misses and incidents to strengthen future safety planning

Learning From Similar Incidents

This case is not isolated. Queensland workplaces have faced comparable penalties following electric shock incidents, reinforcing why proactive risk management remains essential across industries.

A related case, detailed in our article on the NSW construction company fined following a worker's electric shock incident, shows how electrical hazards extend well beyond aquatic settings into construction work.

Similarly, the Victorian feedlot operator fined after an electric shock death demonstrates how agricultural operations face identical exclusion zone challenges when equipment nears overhead powerlines.

Strengthening Safety Documentation

Organisations seeking to prevent similar outcomes should implement clear procedures covering emergency response and equipment use. Our Electric Shock Electrocution Emergency Response Procedure template supports facilities across New Zealand seeking compliant documentation.

For Australian workplaces, our Emergency Response Procedure for Electric Shock and Electrocution offers a practical framework aligned with current safety expectations.

Facilities using powered cleaning equipment should also consider reviewing task-specific documentation, such as our Electric Jackhammer SWMS, which illustrates how safe work method statements address electrical risks for tools used near infrastructure.

Broader Lessons for Industry

Incidents involving powerlines are not confined to aquatic centres. Our coverage of the company fined over the Ettamogah blasting incident reflects a similar pattern, where insufficient hazard controls led to significant penalties.

Across Queensland and beyond, regulators continue pursuing enforcement action wherever workplace failures put employee health at risk. Employers bear responsibility for identifying electrical hazards before work begins, not after an incident occurs.

Key Takeaways for Employers

Every workplace using pool-cleaning equipment or operating near powerlines must treat electrical exclusion zones as non-negotiable safety boundaries. Regular training, updated procedures, and documented risk assessments remain the most effective tools for preventing electric shock incidents.

Read the original article here.

```

Share This Article